As seen in Figure 2, better transfer is seen using a Tris-acetate gel over a 4–20% Tris-glycine gel-9 ng visualized when a Tris-acetate gel was used vs 750 ng visualized when a Tris-glycine gradient gel was used in targeting ~190 kDA protein epidermal growth factor (EGFR).įigure 2. A comparison of HMW protein separation using different gel chemistries and gradients shows the best separation and resolution of HMW proteins can be accomplished with a 3–8% Tris-acetate gel ( Figure 1B). The open matrix structure that allows the HMW proteins to migrate farther through the gel allows better transfer of the HMW proteins out of the gel leading to increased transfer efficiencies and higher sensitivity. By using a Tris-acetate or low gradient Bis-Tris or Tris-glycine gel, HMW proteins can migrate further through the gel, allowing increased distance between protein bands. Proteins >200 kDa are compacted into a very narrow region at the top of the running portion of the gel, leading to poor resolution of protein bands ( Figure 1). While 4–20% Tris-glycine gradient gels are very popular because of their ability to separate a broad range of proteins (20–200 kDa), they are not recommended for separation of HMW proteins. When targeting HMW proteins for your transfer, it is best to use a Tris-acetate gel or low percentage Bis-Tris or Tris-glycine gel. Choosing the right gel is a key factor in the successful transfer of HMW proteins.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |